The Inflection Nobody Is Pricing

Borr Drilling has spent the past eighteen months doing three things simultaneously: expanding its fleet from 24 rigs to 34, executing a landmark $2.035 billion refinancing that eliminates every near-term debt maturity, and operating those rigs at 99.4% technical utilization. In the same period, the share price has spent most of its time trading below $6.

At $4.80 per share — the base for all analysis in this issue — the market assigns Borr a market capitalization of approximately $1.48 billion against an enterprise value of roughly $3.8 billion. That enterprise value represents a business with 34 modern premium jack-up rigs, $1.17 billion in contracted backlog, and a management team that has grown the fleet 40% in two years through deals it financed without a single distressed equity raise.

This issue makes the case that the market has not yet priced two structural realities: first, that the debt wall that has suppressed multiple expansion for two years has now been fully resolved; and second, that the cycle for jack-up rigs is still in its early innings, with the best dayrate environment likely 12 to 24 months ahead of us — not behind us.

Jack-Ups vs. Deepwater: Why the Cost Economics Favour BORR's Market

Before valuing a single share of BORR, investors need to understand why jack-up rigs occupy a structurally privileged position in the offshore drilling ecosystem — one that deepwater contractors like Transocean and Valaris (now merging into a $17 billion entity) simply cannot replicate.

The Hardware Difference

A jack-up rig is a mobile drilling platform with legs that extend to the seabed in shallow water — typically less than 400 feet of water depth. The rig sits above the water surface on these legs, providing exceptional stability for the crew and drill string. Borr's entire fleet of modern Keppel and PPL-designed rigs operates in this space, targeting the world's most active shallow-water basins: the Middle East, Southeast Asia, the Gulf of Mexico, and West Africa.

A deepwater drillship, by contrast, is a floating vessel tethered via dynamic positioning systems to drill in water depths from 1,000 feet to 12,000 feet or more. Transocean's flagship units — the Deepwater Atlas, Deepwater Titan — are engineering marvels capable of drilling in some of the most hostile environments on earth. They are also enormously expensive to build ($800 million to $1 billion per unit), enormously expensive to operate ($500,000 per day at leading-edge rates), and require oil companies to commit to multi-year programmes to justify the economics.

The Breakeven Advantage

The economics of shallow-water jack-up drilling are fundamentally more resilient at lower oil prices than deepwater:

Metric

Jack-Up (Shallow)

Drillship (Deepwater)

Typical water depth

Up to 400 ft

1,000–12,000 ft

Leading-edge dayrate (2026)

$140,000–$175,000

$450,000–$550,000

Typical oil breakeven

$25–$40/bbl

$40–$60/bbl

Contract mobilisation lead time

Weeks to months

6–18 months

Rig construction cost

$200–$250M (modern)

$800M–$1B+

Short-cycle production potential

Very high

Low

OPEC member activity correlation

Very high (Middle East)

Lower

The breakeven advantage matters enormously in the current macro environment. At $65–70 per barrel of oil — the range that has prevailed through much of 2025 and into 2026 — shallow-water jack-up programs remain highly profitable for operators. Many of the highest-value jack-up markets are NOC-dominated (Saudi Aramco, ADNOC, PEMEX, Pertamina) where production targets are driven as much by national revenue requirements as by short-term oil price economics. These customers do not cancel programs at $65 oil; they are mandated to produce.

Deepwater, while recovering, still faces a higher hurdle. The Transocean-Valaris merger — creating a 73-rig colossus focused on ultra-deepwater floaters — is a bet on long-duration contracted work at $450,000+ dayrates. That thesis has merit on a multi-year view, but it requires oil companies to make five-to-ten year financial commitments. It is a different, slower-cycle investment proposition.

Borr's positioning — 34 modern rigs, concentrated in the highest-activity shallow-water markets, with an average rig age well below the global fleet — gives it a structurally superior cost of production advantage that is invisible in headline dayrate comparisons.

What Borr Drilling Actually Is

Borr Drilling was founded in 2016 with a single thesis: buy modern jack-up rigs at distressed-cycle prices and operate them through the recovery. The company's founders — former Seadrill executives — identified that the 2015–2016 downturn had created an opportunity to acquire premium modern equipment at fractions of replacement cost.

From that foundation, Borr has built the youngest and most technically capable jack-up fleet among the pure-play public contractors. The fleet has grown in two steps: from 24 rigs to 29 via the Noble acquisition (completed January 2026), and from 29 to 34 via the Fontis/Paratus 50-50 Mexican JV (announced March 2026, expected to close Q3 2026). As of Q1 2026, the consolidated fleet stands at 29 wholly-owned rigs with the five JV rigs pending close — with management already referring to a 34-rig fleet in anticipation of that closing.

The strategic logic has always been fleet scale plus contract coverage. With 34 rigs at full fleet (once the Fontis JV closes in Q3 2026), Borr can credibly bid on multi-rig national programs that require scale, consistency, and track record. Saudi Aramco, ADNOC, and Pertamina award long-duration work to contractors they trust to deliver across large fleets simultaneously. Single-rig operators cannot bid for this work. Borr, at 34 rigs, is one of the largest premium jack-up contractors among public pure-plays globally, and increasingly wins on that basis.

Q1 2026 By The Numbers

Metric

Q1 2026

Q4 2025

Change

Revenue

$247.0M

$259.4M

-4.8%

Adjusted EBITDA

$88.5M

$105.2M

-15.9%

Technical Utilisation

99.4%

98.8%

+0.6pp

Economic Utilisation

97.0%

96.5%

+0.5pp

Fleet Size (consolidated)

34 rigs (+ 5 JV pending)

29 rigs

+5 (Noble, closed)

2026 Contract Coverage

71%

58%

+13pp

H2 2026 Coverage

65%

48%

+17pp

Avg Contracted Dayrate

~$137,000

~$138,000

Stable

Backlog (at period end)

$1.17B

$1.09B

+7.3%

Cash & Liquidity

$246M cash / $480M total

The Q1 headline numbers look soft on first reading — EBITDA was dented by an $8.4 million credit loss provision and the delayed start of the Odin rig. Strip those items out and the underlying operational performance is strong. 99.4% technical utilization across a 34-rig fleet is exceptional; it means effectively not a single rig was unavailable for planned maintenance or unplanned failure during the quarter. That statistic becomes more impressive when you understand that five of those rigs — the Noble acquisition — had only just been integrated into the operating fleet.

The Two Acquisitions That Built the 34-Rig Fleet

The jump from 22 rigs in mid-2024 to 34 rigs entering 2026 was not organic — it was executed through two strategically distinct transactions that deserve analysis in their own right. 2 outright purchases in 2025 got the count to 24.

Transaction 1: The Noble Five-Rig Acquisition

In late 2025, Borr completed the acquisition of five premium jack-up rigs from Noble Corporation — the same Noble that was simultaneously being absorbed into the Transocean-Valaris deepwater combination. Noble was exiting the jack-up segment entirely to focus on deepwater; Borr was the natural buyer.

The five rigs — all modern premium units — came with existing contracts and operator relationships in the Middle East and Southeast Asia, two of Borr's core markets. The seller's credit structure ($150M, variable rate, due 2027) allowed Borr to fund the acquisition without a large upfront cash outlay, preserving liquidity for operations. These five rigs are now fully integrated into the operational fleet and are included in the 71% H2 2026 coverage figure. They are reflected in every line of the FCF model in this issue.

Transaction 2: The Fontis/Paratus JV — Five Mexican Rigs

In Q1 2026, Borr announced a 50-50 joint venture with Mexican partners (Fontis and BC Ventures) to acquire five Paratus Energy Services rigs operating primarily in Mexico under contracts with Pemex, the Mexican national oil company. The total transaction value was approximately $287 million, with Borr's $25 million cash outlay funded via a non-recourse seller credit — meaning Borr acquired a 50% economic interest in five additional rigs for $25 million of its own cash.

The JV structure is important and requires separate treatment from the wholly-owned fleet:

  • The five JV rigs are not consolidated onto Borr's balance sheet in the same way as the wholly-owned fleet. Borr recognizes its 50% share of JV earnings via equity method accounting — visible in EBITDA but not in revenue.

  • Non-recourse financing means Borr's downside on the JV is structurally capped at its $25M equity investment. The JV's debt cannot flow back to the Borr parent if Mexico revenues disappoint.

  • Mexico is a different risk profile to the rest of the fleet. Pemex has historically been a slow-paying, occasionally renegotiating counterparty. The non-recourse structure and JV format are precisely the risk management tools that a disciplined acquirer uses when entering a market with those characteristics.

  • The pending close as of Q1 2026 means the full earnings contribution of these five rigs was not yet visible in Q1 results. When the JV reaches full operation — expected H2 2026 — it adds meaningful incremental EBITDA to Borr's equity earnings line at near-zero incremental debt cost to the parent.

When management refers to a 34-rig fleet, they mean the 29 wholly-owned rigs plus the five Fontis/Paratus JV rigs once that acquisition closes in Q3 2026. The progression is: 24 rigs (pre-Noble) → 29 rigs (Noble acquisition, January 2026) → 34 rigs (Fontis JV, expected Q3 2026). The FCF model in this issue uses 34 rigs as the full operating fleet from 2027 onwards, with a conservative 29-rig assumption for much of 2026 pending the JV close. This makes the model slightly conservative on 2026 but appropriately reflective of the timing.

The Debt Wall — Built, Then Demolished

The most important thing that has happened to BORR's investment thesis in 2026 has nothing to do with dayrates. It is the complete elimination of near-term refinancing risk through one of the most decisive balance sheet restructurings in the offshore drilling sector's recent history.

To understand why this matters, you need to understand what BORR's debt stack looked like entering 2026 — and what it looks like today.

Before: The Wall That Capped the Multiple

Instrument

Principal

Rate

Maturity

Annual Interest

Senior Secured Notes

$1,178.6M

10.000%

2028

~$118M

Senior Secured Notes

$792.0M

10.375%

2030

~$82M

Convertible Notes

$239.4M

2.75%

2028

~$7M

Seller's Credit (Noble)

$150.0M

Variable

2027

~$12M

Total / Blended

$2,360M

~9.2%

2027–2030

~$219M

This capital structure had one critical problem: $1.18 billion of 10% notes due in 2028 created a refinancing cliff that the market was pricing as an existential risk. At every dayrate scenario below $150,000 per day, BORR's ability to service and eventually retire this debt was questionable. The stock traded accordingly — compressed to a valuation that reflected the debt risk, not the operational quality of the fleet.

The April 2026 Move: Extending the Convertibles

In April 2026, Borr executed the first step: a $300 million offering of new senior unsecured convertible notes due 2033 at 3.5% interest — less than one-third the coupon of the notes they were replacing. The proceeds were used to repurchase and cancel $195.2 million of the 2028 convertible bonds, extending that maturity by five years and reducing the annual interest burden on that tranche by approximately $4 million.

The May 2026 Move: The Decisive Refinancing

On 27 May 2026, Borr priced the transaction that resolves the structural risk entirely. The company issued $2.035 billion of senior secured notes — upsized by $435 million from the originally contemplated $1.6 billion — in two tranches:

Tranche

Principal

Coupon

Maturity

Annual Interest

Senior Secured Notes A

$1,100.0M

8.750%

2032

~$96M

Senior Secured Notes B

$935.0M

9.000%

2034

~$84M

Total New Notes

$2,035.0M

8.86% blended

2032/2034

~$180M

The proceeds were used in full to retire the 10.000% 2028 notes and the 10.375% 2030 notes — the two instruments that constituted the debt wall. Settlement occurred on or around 10 June 2026.

After: What the Debt Stack Looks Like Now

Instrument

Principal (est.)

Rate

Maturity

Notes

Senior Secured Notes A

$1,100M

8.750%

2032

New — bullet maturity

Senior Secured Notes B

$935M

9.000%

2034

New — bullet maturity

Convertible Notes (new)

$300M

3.500%

2033

Issued April 2026

Convertible Notes (remaining)

~$44M

2.750%

2028

Residual post-repurchase

Seller's Credit (Noble)

~$150M

Variable

2027

Nearest maturity

Total / Blended

~$2,529M

~8.1%

2027–2034

No wall before 2027

What This Restructuring Actually Achieves

Three structural improvements that the market has not yet fully valued:

  • No maturity cliff before 2032. The 2028 wall — the single most cited bear case against BORR — has been extinguished. The nearest significant maturity is the small residual 2028 convertible and the $150M Noble seller's credit in 2027, both manageable from operating cash flow.

  • Annual interest reduction of approximately $39 million. The 10.000% and 10.375% notes cost approximately $219M per year in interest. The new structure costs approximately $180M per year — a saving of ~$39M annually that flows directly to free cash flow.

  • Bullet maturities create a clean FCF window. Unlike amortizing facilities that required periodic principal repayments, the new 2032 and 2034 notes are bullet instruments. Borr does not need to reserve cash for scheduled debt repayment through 2031. Every dollar of EBITDA above interest and maintenance capex is available for distribution or growth.

Five-Year Free Cash Flow Model — What You Are Actually Buying

The central question for any BORR investment is deceptively simple: at what dayrate environment does this business generate enough free cash flow to justify a materially higher share price? The answer requires modelling four variables that interact non-linearly: consolidated fleet size, average contracted dayrate, interest burden on the parent balance sheet, and — critically — the separate contribution of the Fontis JV.

The 29 wholly-owned rigs (including the five Noble rigs) are consolidated into Borr's revenue and EBITDA in full. The five Fontis JV rigs are not — they are a 50-50 joint venture accounted for under the equity method, meaning Borr recognizes only its 50% share of JV net income as a single line below EBITDA. The JV's $237 million of non-recourse seller credit debt sits at the JV entity level and is not on Borr's consolidated balance sheet — but it must be serviced before any cash reaches Borr's equity earnings line.

Most published models treat BORR as a simple 34-rig business. That overstates consolidated revenue by approximately 17% and understates the complexity of the JV earnings stream. The model below gets this right.

Block 1: Consolidated Fleet (29 Wholly-Owned Rigs)

Assumption

2026E

2027E

2028E

2029E

2030E

Consolidated rigs

29

29

29

29

29

Economic utilisation

88%

92%

94%

95%

95%

Operating days (consolidated)

~9,320

~9,745

~9,953

~10,063

~10,063

OpEx per rig-day (all-in)

$55,000

$56,000

$57,000

$58,000

$59,000

G&A

$45M

$46M

$47M

$47M

$48M

Parent interest expense (post-refi)

$192M

$192M

$190M

$188M

$186M

Sustaining capex

$100M

$110M

$115M

$115M

$115M

Effective tax rate

12%

12%

12%

12%

12%

Shares outstanding (diluted)

310M

310M

310M

310M

310M

The 2026 consolidated utilisation of 88% is calibrated directly from Q1 actuals — 29 rigs, 97% economic utilisation in Q1, but with the Odin delayed start and two rigs transitioning between contracts expected to weigh on Q2. The H2 improvement is supported by 65% H2 coverage already contracted at $137K average dayrate, rising as uncontracted days fill. Parent interest of $192M reflects the new notes ($180M) plus the April 2026 convertibles ($10.5M) plus residual 2028 converts ($1.2M).

Block 2: Fontis JV (5 Rigs, 50% Equity Earnings)

JV Assumption

2026E (H2 only)

2027E

2028E

2029E

2030E

JV rigs (close expected Q3 2026)

5 (part year)

5

5

5

5

JV economic utilisation

85%

90%

92%

93%

93%

JV operating days

~780

~1,643

~1,679

~1,697

~1,697

JV OpEx per rig-day

$57,000

$58,000

$59,000

$60,000

$61,000

JV interest (seller credit $237M @ 8%)

$9.5M (H2)

$19M

$19M

$19M

$19M

JV tax rate

15%

15%

15%

15%

15%

Borr share of JV net income (50%)

Varies — see table

Mexico context: the JV close is expected Q3 2026, so 2026 reflects approximately half-year contribution. Pemex is a slower-paying customer; the 85% utilization assumption in 2026 includes a conservatism buffer for payment delays and potential idle time during regulatory approvals. From 2027 the five rigs are assumed fully operational at 90%+ utilization.

Combined FCF Sensitivity — 29 Consolidated Rigs + 50% JV Equity Earnings

The table below presents the corrected five-year FCF model at six dayrate scenarios. The consolidated 29-rig revenue and the 50% JV equity earnings contribution are shown separately so the analytical split is transparent. The same dayrate assumption is applied to both blocks for simplicity; in practice JV rigs in Mexico may price differently to the global fleet.

$120K/day

$140K/day

$160K/day

$175K/day

$200K/day

$225K/day

29 Rigs:

Revenue (29 rigs)

$1,119M

$1,305M

$1,491M

$1,631M

$1,864M

$2,097M

Consolidated EBITDA

$506M

$692M

$878M

$1,018M

$1,251M

$1,484M

Parent interest

($192M)

($192M)

($192M)

($192M)

($192M)

($192M)

Sustaining capex

($100M)

($100M)

($100M)

($100M)

($100M)

($100M)

Less: Tax (12%)

($26M)

($48M)

($70M)

($87M)

($115M)

($143M)

FCF total

$188M

$352M

$516M

$639M

$844M

$1,049M

— 2026 JV CONTRIBUTION (50% of 5 rigs, H2 only) —

JV revenue

$94M

$109M

$125M

$136M

$156M

$175M

JV EBITDA

$50M

$65M

$80M

$91M

$110M

$130M

JV interest (50%)

($5M)

($5M)

($5M)

($5M)

($5M)

($5M)

JV tax (50%*15%)

($3M)

($4M)

($6M)

($7M)

($8M)

($9M)

JV Earnings

$22M

$28M

$35M

$40M

$48M

$58M

2026 TOTAL FCF

$210M

$380M

$551M

$679M

$892M

$1,107M

2026 FCF/share ($4.80 base)

$0.68

$1.23

$1.78

$2.19

$2.88

$3.57

2026 FCF yield at $4.80

14.2%

25.6%

37.1%

45.6%

60.0%

74.4%

— 2027 FULL YEAR (29 + 50% of 5 JV rigs) —

Consolidated FCF (29 rigs)

$202M

$378M

$554M

$683M

$905M

$1,126M

JV equity earnings (50% of 5 rigs)

$26M

$39M

$52M

$61M

$77M

$93M

2027 TOTAL FCF

$228M

$417M

$606M

$744M

$982M

$1,219M

2027 FCF/share

$0.74

$1.35

$1.95

$2.40

$3.17

$3.93

2027 FCF yield at $4.80

15.4%

28.1%

40.7%

50.0%

66.0%

81.9%

2028 TOTAL FCF

$235M

$429M

$624M

$765M

$1,010M

$1,254M

2028 FCF/share

$0.76

$1.38

$2.01

$2.47

$3.26

$4.05

2029 TOTAL FCF

$239M

$436M

$633M

$776M

$1,025M

$1,273M

2030 TOTAL FCF

$241M

$440M

$638M

$782M

$1,034M

$1,284M

5-Yr Cumulative FCF

$1,153M

$2,102M

$3,052M

$3,746M

$4,943M

$6,137M

5-Yr FCF vs $1.48B Mkt Cap

78%

142%

206%

253%

334%

415%

Several observations from the model:

  • The 2026 FCF yield at base-case $140K/day is 25.6% on a $4.80 stock.

  • The JV adds $28–93M of equity earnings annually from 2027 depending on dayrates — real cash that flows to Borr shareholders at zero incremental debt cost to the parent. At $140K/day the JV contributes approximately $39M in 2027, adding $0.13/share to FCF.

  • At $175,000/day — a moderate upcycle, consistent with 2023 average rates — the 5-year cumulative FCF of $3.75 billion is 253% of the current market capitalization. The entire market cap is recovered in cash well before the end of 2027.

  • Even at $120,000/day — a scenario that has not been sustained at annual average level since the COVID trough — Borr generates $210M of positive FCF in 2026 and $228M in 2027.

Why The Old Amortization Figure Is Gone — And Why It Matters

The Q1 2026 investor presentation shows '$144M debt amortization per annum' prominently on the liquidity slide. This figure was correct for the old capital structure — the 10% 2028 notes and 10.375% 2030 notes included scheduled amortization payments. The May 2026 refinancing replaced both instruments entirely with bullet notes maturing in 2032 and 2034. Bullet notes have no scheduled amortization — the principal is repaid in full at maturity. The $144M annual cash outflow is gone. This single structural change adds $144M to annual FCF, equivalent to $0.46 per share per year, or $2.32 per share cumulatively over five years.

At $4.80 per share, that $2.32 cumulative FCF benefit represents 48% of the current market capitalization — created purely by the refinancing, before a single dayrate improvement occurs.

Why BORR Has Greater Torque Than Any Comparable

'Torque' in an investment context means sensitivity to positive change — the leverage embedded in the business model such that a given improvement in underlying conditions produces an outsized improvement in shareholder value. BORR has exceptional torque for three structural reasons that most comparable companies cannot replicate.

1. Pure-Play Fleet Scale — The Operating Leverage Effect

Operating leverage in jack-up drilling is extreme. Rig operating costs (crew, maintenance, insurance, logistics) are largely fixed regardless of dayrate. When dayrates increase by $10,000 per day, the overwhelming majority of that increment falls directly to EBITDA.

2. The Youngest Fleet Premium — Dayrate Capture

Not all jack-up rigs command the same dayrates. Premium modern rigs — the kind Borr operates, designed to 350-foot water depth with advanced well control systems and high variable deck loads — consistently command a 15–25% premium over older, legacy units.

3. No Amortisation — The FCF Conversion Advantage

This is the most underappreciated structural difference between BORR and its closest peers. The new 2032 and 2034 bullet notes require no scheduled principal repayment through 2031. Valaris (pre-merger) and Transocean carry amortising credit facilities and term loans that require meaningful annual principal payments — capital that reduces FCF available to equity holders.

Torque Comparison — How BORR Stacks Up

Metric

BORR (29+5 JV rigs)

VAL/RIG (Combined)

NE (Noble)

Fleet type

Pure-play jack-up

Deepwater-focused

Mixed

FCF per $10K dayrate increase

~$105M/yr (consolidated + JV)

N/A (different structure)

~$55M/yr est.

Nearest debt maturity

2027 ($150M seller credit only)

2026–2028 (varies)

2028+

Amortisation requirements

None until 2032 (bullet notes)

Yes — term facilities

Yes

Implied EV/EBITDA at $140K rates

~3.8x

~8–10x

~6–7x

Equity market cap vs EV

~39% (high leverage torque)

~55–60%

~50%

The EV/EBITDA comparison is even more striking on the corrected numbers. At $140,000/day rates, consensus EBITDA of approximately $440M (29 consolidated rigs, per Q1 management commentary) implies Borr trades at approximately 3.8x EBITDA on an enterprise value of ~$3.8 billion — compared to 8–10x for the Transocean-Valaris deepwater entity. The JV equity earnings add a further ~$39M that does not flow through the EBITDA line at all, making the effective economic multiple even lower.

The Honest Risks

There are four risks that warrant real weight.

1. Saudi Aramco Suspension — The Single Largest Near-Term Variable

The Aramco suspension is both the largest near-term risk and the largest near-term catalyst. BORR has meaningful fleet exposure to the Middle East; if Aramco's reduced program is sustained through 2027, the H2 2026 and FY2027 FCF scenarios shift materially toward the lower columns in the sensitivity table. The company itself acknowledged Middle East uncertainty on the Q1 2026 call while expressing confidence about 2027 and 2028 prospects.

2. Leverage is Real — Interest Coverage at Low Dayrates is Thin

At $120,000/day, BORR generates negative FCF. This is not an existential crisis — the company has $480M of total liquidity and no debt maturities of consequence before 2027 — but it means the share price is highly sensitive to sustained low dayrates. The margin for error below $130,000/day is limited.

3. Mexico JV Execution Risk

The five-rig Paratus acquisition via a 50-50 JV with Mexican partners adds scale but also complexity. Mexico's NOC (Pemex) has historically been a difficult customer — payment terms are often extended and contract renegotiations are not uncommon. The JV structure limits BORR's downside but also caps upside if the Mexican market softens.

4. Share Dilution From Convertibles

The $300 million of 2033 convertible notes convert into shares at $8.00 per share — approximately 37.5 million additional shares. If the stock re-rates to $8–$10, conversion becomes likely, adding approximately 12% to the share count. Investors buying below the conversion price are effectively protected; those buying above should factor this into their per-share analysis.

The Bottom Line

Borr Drilling at $4.80 per share is a business with 29 wholly-owned premium jack-up rigs plus a 50% economic interest in five more via a Mexican JV — a contract backlog of $1.17 billion, near-zero refinancing risk through 2031, and a management team that has grown the fleet 40% in two years while maintaining 99%+ technical utilization. The primary reason the stock has traded at a compressed multiple is no longer present.

The debt wall is gone. The $144M of annual amortization payments that existed under the old structure have been eliminated by the bullet note refinancing. The fleet is scaled. The cycle is early.

At current dayrates on the corrected model — properly splitting the 29 consolidated rigs from the 50% JV equity earnings — BORR generates a 25.6% FCF yield at $140K/day on the base price. That is not a bull case number. It is current rates on the existing contracted fleet, with the amortisation drag correctly removed. At $160,000/day — rates last seen in 2023 — the FCF yield exceeds 37% and the 5-year cumulative FCF of $3.05 billion is more than twice the current market capitalisation.

The market is pricing BORR as though the refinancing risk still exists and as though the $144M annual amortisation is still running. Both of those assumptions were true six months ago. Neither is true today. The bullet note structure means no principal is due until 2032.

For a business generating $105M of incremental annual FCF per $10,000 of dayrate improvement across its full economic fleet — and that has just eliminated the one structural impediment to multiple expansion — the asymmetry from $4.80 is compelling. It does not need perfection. It needs rates to recover by $15,000–$20,000 and the market to process what the refinancing actually did to the capital structure.

Both of those conditions are either already in place or in progress.

Reply

Avatar

or to participate

Keep reading